• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Hurst v. State, No. 49A02-1004-CR-378, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 16, 2010)

December 17, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Showing the police his eleven year-old’s text message and photograph of purported marijuana in stepfather’s house sufficiently corroborated the reliability of father’s report to police of the daughter’s message to support a search warrant for the house.

Runyon v. State, No. 57S04-1006-CR-317, __N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 8, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, Supreme

To revoke probation for failure to comply with a financial condition, the State has the burden to prove by a preponderance that the condition was violated and that the violation was reckless, knowing, or intentional; the probationer has the burden to present “facts related to an inability to pay and indicating sufficient bona fide efforts to pay so as to persuade the trial court that further imprisonment should not be ordered.”

Haynes v. State, No. 27A02-1003-CR-311, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 8, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Officer who witnessed what appeared to be a parking infraction, but could not investigate further to issue a citation before the vehicle drove off, properly stopped the vehicle to issue the complaint and summons.

Akard v. State, No. 79S02-1009-CR-478, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 9, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

An appellate review increase in defendant’s sentence, while within an appellate court’s authority under Appellate Rule 7(B), is not ordered in this case, particularly since the State agreed that the sentence the trial judge imposed was appropriate.

Britt v. State, No. 02A03-1004-CR-253, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 1, 2010)

December 3, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Britt v. State (Ind. Ct. App., Mathias, J.)-When robbery defendant called his brother as a witness and did not attack the brother’s credibility, the brother’s prior robbery conviction was inadmissible character evidence.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 280
  • Go to page 281
  • Go to page 282
  • Go to page 283
  • Go to page 284
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 324
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs