• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Jennings v. State, No. 53A01-1010-CR-541, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2010).

February 10, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Misdemeanor sentencing addressed on rehearing.

McCaa v. State, No. 56A04-1107-CR-341, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 30, 2012).

February 3, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford, M. Barnes

Officer did not violate Fourth Amendment or Indiana Constitution by having defendant drive his truck two miles down the road to a gas station to continue the investigatory stop made on reasonable suspicion, when the truck was blocking the single lane of traffic, it was raining, and the defendant’s driving posed no severe risks.

Stark v. State, No. 49A05-1104-CR-152, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2012).

February 3, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Although jacket possessor was out of vehicle and handcuffed, officer’s search of the jacket in the car did not violate Arizona v. Gant when three occupants remained in the vehicle, suspect had acted suspiciously about the jacket, and car was in high crime area.

Anderson v. State, No. 49A05-1105-CR-243, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 31, 2012).

February 3, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

DNA felony conviction swab statute’s “mistake” exception applied to probation officer’s taking of cheek swab from defendant when abstract of judgment officer had indicated a D felony conviction, with no mention of alternative misdemeanor sentencing.

Adams v. State, No. 29S02-1109-CR-542, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Feb. 2, 2012).

February 3, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

To impose the IC 35-48-4-15(a) mandatory license suspension for using a vehicle in the commission of a drug offense, the “State must demonstrate that a defendant made more than an incidental use of a motor vehicle in committing his offense”; evidence defendant “possessed a jar of marijuana by keeping the jar on the floorboard in front of him while he sat in the passenger seat” supported suspension; it was “not a situation in which a defendant merely happened to possess a small bag of marijuana in his pocket without making any direct use of the vehicle to do so.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 250
  • Go to page 251
  • Go to page 252
  • Go to page 253
  • Go to page 254
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 323
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs