Indiana “actual evidence” double jeopardy test applies only to convictions, not to acquittals, mistrials, or combinations of the two. Statute of limitations applied to bar amendment adding a new charge following mistrial.
Criminal
Dillon v. State, No. 27A05-1210-CR-542, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2013).
When nunc pro tunc order reinstating OWI conviction after its “inadvertent[] dismissal” by State was entered after defendant had committed his second OWI offense, the reinstated conviction could not serve as a basis for enhancing the second to a D felony.
State v. Owens, No. 49A02-1210-CR-817, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2013).
When the police had illegally detained the suspect and discovery of the cocaine on his person became inevitable due to the illegal stop, suppression of the cocaine was required even though its actual discovery occurred when the suspect fled and was reapprehended.
Hale v. State, No. 25A04-1301-CR-15, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 6, 2013).
Assesses procedure applicable to a habeas petition asserting credit time entitled petitioner to immediate release from jail work release portion of sentence; interprets work release sentence as one for direct commitment to community corrections; and concludes work release credit time applies to community corrections, home detention, and probation sentence in the aggregate.
Ryan v. State, No. 49A02-1211-CR-932, __ N.E.2 __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 31, 2013).
Prosecutor’s improper comments amounted to fundamental error.