• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Meadows v. State, No. 39A01-1305-CR-215, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 29, 2014).

January 30, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Statutes mandating credit for time served for probation and community corrections do not apply to a person in a conviction-deferral drug court program, so that it was within the program judge’s discretion to refuse to award credit for time served when the court terminated the defendant’s placement in the program.

Aslinger v. State, No. 35A02-1303-CR-296, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 23, 2014).

January 23, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb, P. Riley

Terry stop was improperly extended with a search for evidence. Instruction on methamphetamine manufacturing defense of being “briefly in” 1,000 feet of a park was properly rejected because the defendant was charged with dealing, not manufacturing, even though the charged was “grounded in manufacturing.”

State v. Banks, No. 49A02-1303-CR-235, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 23, 2014).

January 23, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Affirms trial court’s suppression of confession on the basis it was not voluntary.

Gaines v. State, No. 49A04-1303-CR-123, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 20, 2013).

January 2, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Return of service for an ex parte protective order was not “testimonial” so that its admission as evidence did not violate the defendant’s Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause right.

Jadrich v. State, No. 32A04-1302-CR-67, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 23, 2013).

January 2, 2014 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Officer’s entry into back yard through closed fence gate, when signs said to “use front door only,” violated the Fourth Amendment; the fact that the officer was attempting to serve a protective order did not avoid the violation.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 214
  • Go to page 215
  • Go to page 216
  • Go to page 217
  • Go to page 218
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 325
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs