The trial court’s sentencing statement did not constitute an order reinstating defendant’s substantive right to bear arms.
Criminal
Dobeski v. State, No. 49A02-1603-CR-440, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 12, 2016).
When computing the time allowed to register as a sex offender, the day of the triggering event should be excluded.
Waters v. State, No. 06A05-1604-CR-863, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 12, 2016).
Trial court should impose a narrower internet restriction that is more in line defendant’s crime rather than a complete internet ban.
Mathews v. State, No. 01A02-1601-CR-104, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 12, 2016).
A party seeking judicial recusal must properly bring a Criminal Rule 12 motion, and is not entitled to relief based solely on obligations under the Code of Judicial Conduct.
Osborne v. State, No. 29S02-1608-CR-433, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 29, 2016).
It was unreasonable for the officer to conduct an investigatory stop when he responded to a report that a woman was trapped under her car, but the woman had freed herself prior to his arrival, and the officer witnessed no traffic infractions or criminal conduct.