• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Criminal

Johnson v. State, No. 32S05-1707-CR-469, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 21, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

The state must prove that each of the three prior unrelated felony convictions meet the ten-year requirement in order to have a person sentenced as a habitual offender under Ind. Code 35-50-2-8(d).

Calvin v. State, No. 02S03-1709-CR-611 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 21, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, M. Massa, Supreme

Despite an argument that it leads to an absurd result, a level 4 burglary conviction could not be enhanced with a habitual-offender finding because defendant’s two prior out-of-state convictions must be treated as Level 6 felonies under Ind. Code 35-50-2-8(b).

Fields v. State, No. 43A03-1704-CR-856, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 22, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Trial court properly denied defendant’s motion to dismiss charges against him because the arresting officer was acting as a de facto officer and his failure to take the statutory oath was a technical defect.

Alford v. Johnson Cnty. Commissioners, No. 73A04-1702-PL-223, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 29, 2017).

December 29, 2017 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Trial court properly dismissed for failure to state a claim a complaint by defendants that the rights of indigent criminal defendants are being ignored because the attorneys assigned as public defenders are burdened by unmanageable caseloads and not providing actual assistance of counsel as required by the United States Constitution and the Indiana Constitution.

McMiller v. State, No. 49A02-1706-CR-1192, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., December 18, 2017).

December 18, 2017 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

Although the defendant deprived the restaurant of the value of the food and drink consumed when he could not pay the bill, the conviction was reversed because the state failed to prove that he had the requisite intent to commit theft.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 102
  • Go to page 103
  • Go to page 104
  • Go to page 105
  • Go to page 106
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 323
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs