• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Jones v. Gruca, No. 19A-DR-2484, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 18, 2020).

June 22, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Ordering parents to work with a parenting coordinator before filing motions regarding custody, support, or visitation did not violate the Indiana Constitution’s open courts clause.

In re Paternity of J.G., No. 19A-JP-2429, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 4, 2020).

June 8, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Even though husband was presumed to be child’s father, his paternity had not been established so the prosecuting attorney was authorized to file a paternity petition.

River Ridge Dev. Authority v. Outfront Media, LLC, No. 19S-PL-645, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 29, 2020).

June 1, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

“The common-law obdurate behavior exception and the General Recovery Rule cannot authorize a trial court to award attorney’s fees when a party voluntarily dismisses its suit with prejudice. But a court can, at any point in litigation, exercise its inherent authority to sanction a party’s bad behavior by shifting fees.”

In re Termination of Tre.S, No. 19A-JT-2915, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 27, 2020).

June 1, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Reminder to trial-level DCS attorneys and trial courts that they have a duty to ensure that parents’ due-process rights in termination cases are not violated.

FM Nephrology Partners N. Central Ind. Dialysis Centers, LLC v. Meritain Health, Inc., No. 20S-PL-302, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 11, 2020).

May 18, 2020 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, Supreme

Case was not preempted by ERISA when a health-care provider sued defendant health-insurance plans, which are governed by ERISA, allege they failed to pay agreed reimbursement rates for covered services under their plans.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 59
  • Go to page 60
  • Go to page 61
  • Go to page 62
  • Go to page 63
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 253
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs