• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Cutchin v. Beard, No. 21S-CQ-48, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 30, 2021).

July 6, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: G. Slaughter, S. David, Supreme

Indiana Medical Malpractice Act applies when a plaintiff alleges that a qualified health-care provider treated someone else negligently and that the negligent treatment injured the plaintiff.

City of Marion v. London Witte Group, No. 20S-MI-00567, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 17, 2021).

June 21, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

The Indiana Supreme Court adopts the equitable tolling doctrine of adverse domination when intentional wrongdoing is alleged.

Atkins v. Crawford County Clerk’s Office, No. 20A-MI-2160, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 1, 2021).

June 7, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Trial court improperly denied a motion to waive the filing fee when plaintiff filed a verified affidavit of indigency with documentation of her cash assets. If the trial court had any doubt about plaintiff’s indigency, the trial court could have waived the filing fee, and, upon a later discovery that the litigant has the means to pay, order reimbursement of the waived fee; or a trial court may hold a hearing to examine the litigant’s potential indigency.

In re Adoption of K.T., No. 20A-AD-2102, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 1, 2021).

June 7, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

The ongoing CHINS proceeding did not prohibit the trial court from dispensing with mother’s and father’s consents in the adoption proceeding.

AO Alfa-Bank v. Doe, No. 20A-MI-2352, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 19, 2021).

May 24, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas

Court did not have subject matter jurisdiction to consider a motion to quash an out-of-state subpoena which had not been domesticated.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 48
  • Go to page 49
  • Go to page 50
  • Go to page 51
  • Go to page 52
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 253
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs