• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Rambo v. Rambo, No. 21A-DC-2472, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 25, 2022).

April 25, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

A court cannot enter a provisional order in a dissolution of marriage for the sale of marital property.

ResCare Health Svcs., Inc. v. Ind. Family & Social Svcs. Admin., No. 21S-MI-372__ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 5, 2022).

April 11, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

Although a complaint for declaratory judgment could not be decided by an ALJ, upon judicial review, one could be reviewed by the trial court judge without a separate complaint being filed.

Tippecanoe School Corp. v. Reynolds, No. 21A-CT-1482, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 7, 2022).

April 11, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Negligent supervision in sports is not a separate cause of action; an analysis of a coach’s individual actions related to supervising her athletes and the choices made are subsumed by a review of whether that coach was intentional or reckless in her conduct.

Abbott v. State, No. 21S-PL-347, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 29, 2022).

April 4, 2022 Filed Under: Civil, Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, S. David, Supreme

David, J. In Indiana, civil forfeiture actions typically proceed under one of two statutes: the general forfeiture statute or the racketeering forfeiture statute. Today, we consider whether the racketeering forfeiture statute permits a court to release, to the defendant, funds seized in a forfeiture action so the defendant can hire counsel in that same action. […]

PNC Bank, N.A. v, Page, No. 21A-MF-1974, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 31, 2022).

April 4, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, R. Altice

The orders issued during COVID-19 pausing the accrual of interest did not suspend the automatic accrual of non-discretionary interest provided by the terms of a private loan instrument and as permitted by statute.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 38
  • Go to page 39
  • Go to page 40
  • Go to page 41
  • Go to page 42
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs