• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Posterity Scholar House, LP v. FCCI Ins. Co., No. 22A-EV-1751, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 1, 2023).

March 6, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, L. Weissmann

The common law duty of good faith in performing its obligations under an insurance policy that an insurer owes its insured a does not extend to the relationship between surety and obligee in the context of performance and payment bonds on a construction project.

Wilson v. Wilson, No. 22A-DC-1949, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 20, 2023).

February 27, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Commentary to Indiana Child Support Guideline states, “although Social Security benefits are not reflected on Line 7 of the child support Worksheet, the benefit should be considered, and its effect and application shall be included in the written order for support of that child.” Accordingly, a trial court is required to make findings whether a child’s overall financial needs are satisfied in whole, or in part, by the Social Security benefits the child receives.

Tutt v. Evansville Police Dept., No. 23A-MI-1723, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 20, 2023).

February 27, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Neither APRA, nor Title 9, authorizes a fee to inspect an accident report.

Johnson v. Housing Auth. Of South Bend, No. 22A-EV-1751, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 14, 2023).

February 17, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Foley

Small claims court deprived defendant of her due process rights when it refused to hear her defenses. Parties, represented or not, must not be expected to insist on being given the protections to which they are guaranteed and should automatically receive.

R.M. v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 22A-XP-1661, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 15, 2023).

February 17, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. May

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied petitioner’s request to expunge DCS’s substantiated reports about her because she did not show those records had insufficient current probative value to justify their retention by DCS for future reference. Petitioner currently lives with a child and is in college with her future field of work unknown.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 32
  • Go to page 33
  • Go to page 34
  • Go to page 35
  • Go to page 36
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs