• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re Custody of J.V., No. 27A02-0903-JV-232, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 7, 2009)

July 17, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Although evidence supports trial court’s determination that grandmother was de facto custodian, trial court was also required to make findings regarding its determination to award custody to grandmother.

Nicevski v. Nicevski, No. 02A04-0904-CV-188, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., July 8, 2009)

July 17, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

In a dissolution case, trial court erred by including in the marital estate the value of a residence titled in husbandâ’s parents’ name, because his parents were not joined as necessary nonparties pursuant to Indiana Trial Rule 7(B).

In re Adoption of Unborn Child B.W., No. 03S04-0810-CV-560, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., June 26, 2009)

July 2, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, R. Shepard, Supreme, T. Boehm

Biological father’s consent to the adoption of his child was not irrevocably implied when he failed to file a motion to contest in the adoption court but did take concurrent steps to establish paternity and preserve and assert his parental rights in another court.

In re N.S. and J.M., No. 32A05-0902-JV-78, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 30, 2009)

July 2, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Trial court erred by ordering that DCS pay the GAL fees associated with the underlying CHINS proceedings; Indiana Code §§ 31-40-3-2 and 33-24-6-4 require that the county, not DCS, is responsible for the GAL fees.

Washington Twp. Fire Dep't v. Beltway Surgery Ctr., No. 93A02-0811-EX-1006, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., June 24, 2009)

June 26, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

The employer of an injured employee bears the burden of proving that a medical service provider’s bill exceeds the Worker’s Compensation 80th percentile standard.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 246
  • Go to page 247
  • Go to page 248
  • Go to page 249
  • Go to page 250
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 258
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs