• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co., No. 49S02-0805-CV-244 , __N.E.2d__ (Ind., Apr. 28, 2009)

May 1, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

When insured failed for three years to give notice of environmental action against it to insurer, the insurer’s duty to defend never arose during the three years and the insurer need not show any prejudice from the delayed notification.

Lake County Trust Company v. Advisory Plan Commission of Lake County, No. 37S03-0904-CV-192m, __N.E.2d__ (Ind., Apr. 28, 2009)

May 1, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

Governmental entities are not immune from sanctions imposed pursuant to Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules. Mediated agreement on subdivision plan could not be final until approved by Plan Commission at an open meeting subject to the Open Door statutes.

Moore v. Moore, No. 49A02-0810-CV-978, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 16, 2009)

May 1, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Protective order prohibiting only threats or violence but permitting contact erroneously did not address petitioner’s concerns with harassment or provide relief necessary to prevent violence or threats of violence as required by statute.

Payday Today, Inc. v. Defreeuw, No. 71A05-0804-CV-253, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 9, 2009)

April 24, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, B. Barteau

Because payday loan company did not unambiguously include interest in its agreement with the borrower, it cannot recover interest from that borrower.

Hay v. Baumgartner, No. 43A03-0810-CV-484, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 9, 2009)

April 24, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Barnes

Defendants’ stipulation to the entry of a preliminary injunction prevents them from now arguing that it was wrongfully in place, and thereby precludes their recovery of attorney’s fees for its entry.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 245
  • Go to page 246
  • Go to page 247
  • Go to page 248
  • Go to page 249
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs