• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Bush v. State Farm Mut. Ins. Co., No. 71S03-0810-CV-558, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 13, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

An uninsured motorist policy restricting coverage to bodily injury or death sustained by an insured does not violate Indiana’s uninsured motorist statute.

Conwell v. Gray Loon Outdoor Marketing Group, Inc., No. 82S04-0806-CV-309, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 19, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme, T. Boehm

The Uniform Commercial Code did not apply to a suit between a business enterprise and the marketing firm that created and hosted its website; thus the firm may collect for its work under principles of common law contract.

Gary Community School Corp. v. Powell, No. 45S03-0809-CV-482, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., May 19, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme, T. Boehm

An employee filling multiple positions with the same employer is eligible for leave under the federal Family and Medical Leave Act if that employee’s total service is sufficient to qualify, even if service in either position alone does not qualify.

Travelers Indemn. Co. v. Jarrells, No. 29A02-0807-CV-669, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 21, 2009)

May 22, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Darden, N. Vaidik, P. Riley

Travelers Indem. Co. v. Jarrells (Ind. Ct. App., Darden, J.) – Although (or because) trial court instructed the jury that, in determining its verdict, it must consider evidence of worker’s compensation payments, employer’s insurance carrier is entitled to reimbursement from the judgment for the worker’s compensation it paid on the injured employee’s behalf.

Metro Health Professionals, Inc. v. Chrysler, LLC, No. 06A04-0809-CV-547, __ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 4, 2009)

May 8, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

Auto purchaser was entitled to “Lemon Law” relief after seller’s fourth unsuccessful repair attempt even though a fifth repair attempt apparently succeeded after the “Lemon Law” was invoked.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 244
  • Go to page 245
  • Go to page 246
  • Go to page 247
  • Go to page 248
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs