• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Sharon Gill v. Evansville Sheet Metal Works, Inc., No. 49A05-0912-CV-699, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 15, 2010)

December 17, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

A trial court should not blindly adhere to all of its local rules, but examine technical rules when it appears that invoking them would defeat justice.

In re the Adoption of L.D., No. 49S02-1006-CV-330, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 16, 2010)

December 17, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Adoption notice by publication to mother complied with statute but failed to meet the due process requirement of a “diligent search reasonably calculated to determine the mother’s whereabouts.”

Marion County Auditor v. Saw Mill Creek, LLC, No. 49A02-0912-CV-1192, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 3, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Mathias

Statutory requirement that auditor send a first-class mail notice of tax due to property owner when initial certified mail notice is returned undelivered must be complied with to comport with due process.

Rider v. McCamment, No. 16A01-1004-CT-180, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 6, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, P. Riley

When home-buyer was by agreement not to be on home construction premises without permission, fact home-buyer had been on the premises numerous times and may have been seen then by contractor precluded summary judgment against home-buyer on her negligence claim for injuries suffered when she was on the construction site.

Brindle v. Arata, No. 02A05-1004-SC-239, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 7, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, C. Bradford

Student loan funds, exempt from garnishment under federal statute, retain their exempt status after deposit in the student’s bank account.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 215
  • Go to page 216
  • Go to page 217
  • Go to page 218
  • Go to page 219
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 256
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs