• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re Ind. Newspapers, Inc., No. 49A02-1103-PL-23, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 21, 2012).

February 23, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Regarding whether a non-party news organization can be compelled to disclose in a defamation lawsuit the identity of an anonymous commenter, the Court of Appeals adopts a modified Dendrite test requiring the plaintiff to produce prima facie evidence to support only those elements of the cause of action that are not dependent on the commenter’s identity.

Bloomington Magazine, Inc. v. Kiang, No. 53A05-1012-SC-790, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 13, 2012).

February 16, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Brown

The professional relationship between the trial court judge and attorney who served as the chairman of the judge’s election committee was not so remote in time so as to dispel the appearance of an impropriety such that a reasonable person would have a rational basis for doubting the judge’s impartiality.

Berryhill v. Parkview Hosp., No. 02A04-1108-SC-40, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 16, 2012).

February 16, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, T. Crone

In detaining an individual, “security guards ‘act[ed] according to’ Indiana Code Article 12-26, which governs the voluntary and involuntary treatment of mentally ill individuals, and ‘assist[ed] in the detention, care, and treatment of an individual alleged … to have a mental illness’ for purposes of Indiana Code Section 12-26-2-6(a)” and are entitled to immunity from the individual’s false imprisonment claim.

Jackson v. Holiness, No. 02A03-1103-RS-9, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 8, 2012).

February 9, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Najam

Trial court did not err in dismissing mother’s petition to modify child support, because she is not a non-resident petitioner as required by Ind. Code 31-18-6-11 and so the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction.

Person v. Shipley, No. 20S03-1110-CT-609, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Jan. 31, 2012).

February 3, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting expert testimony offered by a personal injury defendant in a rear-end collision case.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 203
  • Go to page 204
  • Go to page 205
  • Go to page 206
  • Go to page 207
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs