Adopts an objective standard for determining when a statement made by an attorney about a judicial officer violates Indiana Professional Conduct Rule 8.2(a), “A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity of a judge . . . .”
Civil
Palmer v. Sales, No. 45A03-1302-SC-3, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2013).
T.R. 76(C)(5) does not apply to change of judge requests in small claims cases; the change of judge request made pursuant to T.R. 76(C)(1) should have been granted.
Asher v. Coomler , No. 49A04-1302-DR-71, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2013).
When the appointed special judge was unavailable, under T.R. 79(I)(2)(a), only a judge pro tempore, temporary judge, or a senior judge appointed by the special judge could preside over proceedings.
Atkins v. Veolia Water Indianapolis, LLC, No. 49A02-1302-CT-181, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 1, 2013).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying the party’s request to file a belated appeal. Although counsel did not have actual knowledge of the order, counsel did have notice, which is a prerequisite to relief under T.R. 72(E).
In re N.C.G., No. 02A04-1301-JP-21, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 19, 2013).
“[S]o long as a father pays child support, exercises parenting time, and actively participates in the child’s life, then the best interests of the child may be served by giving the child the father’s surname to reinforce the bond between father and his nonmarital child, particularly if father is the noncustodial parent.”