“[I]n determining whether a medical malpractice claim has been commenced within the medical malpractice statute of limitations, the discovery or trigger date is the point when a claimant either knows of the malpractice and resulting injury, or learns of facts that, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should lead to the discovery of the malpractice and the resulting injury.”
Civil
In re A.S., No. 10S01-1402-MH-113m __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 13, 2014).
Trial court lacked authority for its contempt finding against the person who filled out the application for emergency detention for another person.
Bailey v. Bailey, No. 25A04-1309-DR-452., __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2014).
The trial court erred in modifying custody when neither party requested a modification of custody.
In re B.C.H., No. 41A04-1308-AD-388, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2014).
Grandparents were not “lawful custodians” or “de facto custodians” as statutorily required for notice and consent for their grandchild’s adoption.
Co-Alliance, LLP v. Monticello Farm Service, Inc., No. 91A05-1312-PL-607, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 23, 2014).
Adopts the majority rule on agreements to modify the priority of liens securing interests in a borrower’s assets.