Trial court should have granted defendant’s counsel request for a contempt hearing even though the trial court suspended the sentence and indicated it would reconsider the issue of appointing counsel prior to the compliance hearing.
Civil
Hoagland v. Franklin Township Comm. School Corp., No. 49A02-1301-PL-44, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 10, 2014).
Students cannot be charged to ride the bus to and from school.
Robinson v. Erie Ins. Exchange, No. 49S02-1311-PL-733, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 11, 2014).
The auto insurance policy issued to a family does not provide uninsured motorists coverage in a hit-and-run accident.
In re V.A., No. 39A01-1307-JP-304, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 30, 2014).
Despite the T.R. 76(B) request for change of judge, matters in the case remanded by the Court of Appeals should be heard by the prior judge who heard the evidence.
Alldredge v. The Good Samaritan Home, Inc., No. 82S01-1305-CT-363, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 2, 2014).
“[I]f a plaintiff makes the necessary factual showing, the Fraudulent Concealment Statute may apply to toll the Wrongful Death Act’s two-year filing period.”