• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Anonymous Physician v. Rogers, No. 02A03-1401-CT-1, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 7, 2014).

November 13, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch, M. Robb

Doctrine of continuing wrong does not apply to doctor’s continued use of disinfectant that caused plaintiff’s allergic reaction in his medical malpractice action.

Teaching Our Posterity Success, Inc. v. Ind. Dept. of Education, No. 49S05-1411-PL-700, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Nov. 6, 2014).

November 13, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

A petitioner seeking judicial review of an agency action must file with the trial court the agency record, defined by the Administrative Orders and Procedures Act, or the petition will be dismissed.

Neal v. Austin, No. 49A02-1404-DR-225__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 31, 2014).

November 6, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6 “necessitates that where the most recent order establishing a child support obligation was issued after June 30, 2012, the child must file a petition for educational needs before the child becomes nineteen years of age.”

LBM Realty, LLC, v. Mannia, No. 71A03-1402-PL-66, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 28, 2014).

October 30, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

“Indiana should hereby adopt the largely case-by-case approach, finding that a tenant’s liability to the landlord’s insurer for damage-causing negligence depends on the reasonable expectations of the parties to the lease as ascertained from the lease as a whole and any other admissible evidence.”

In re I.B., No. 82A05-1402-AD-65, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 28, 2014).

October 30, 2014 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander

A prospective adoptive parent’s prior conviction was not dispositive (Ind. Code § 31-19-11-1) and the children were entitled to an individualized determination of their best interests.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 162
  • Go to page 163
  • Go to page 164
  • Go to page 165
  • Go to page 166
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs