Responding to the plaintiff’s demand was not the defendant’s only option to mitigate damages, but the trial court was within its discretion to reduce damages.
Civil
Camoplast Crocker, LLC v. Magic Circle Corp., No. 29S02-1407-CT-476, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 21, 2014).
Plaintiff’s amendment of the complaint was proper when it was filed before the two-year limitation period expired, even though the court granted the motion to amend after the limitation period expired.
In re K.W., No. 49S02-1407-JT-458., __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 10, 2014).
The trial court abused it discretion by proceeding with a hearing and terminating parental rights in the parent’s absence when the parent was in jail.
Belcher v. Kroczek, No. 45A03-1311-CT-436 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2014).
Reputation, privacy, and identity are not chattel under T.R. 75(A)(2).
South Shore Baseball, LLC v. DeJesus, No. 45S03-1308-CT-531, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 27, 2014).
Stadiums and franchises have no special limited duty beyond the principles of premises liability.