Indiana does not have personal jurisdiction over an attorney that never practiced law in Indiana and did not seek business from Indiana residents – she had no minimum contacts within or substantial connection to Indiana.
Civil
Reef v. Asset Acceptance, LLC, No. 49A05-1501-CC-3, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 11, 2015).
When a party failed to properly designate evidence in support of its motion for summary judgment, the trial court’s award of summary judgment was inappropriate.
Alkhalidi v. Ind. Dept. of Correction, No. 77A01-1406-SC-278, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 28, 2015).
The failure to exhaust administrative remedies should be treated as procedural error, not a jurisdictional defect. Because exhaustion of remedies is not an element of plaintiff’s action, the exhaustion requirement is more appropriately considered an affirmative defense and it is the defendant’s burden to prove.
Stanke v. Swickard, No. 29A02-1412-DR-862, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2015).
Defendant’s due process rights were violated and the trial court erred in finding defendant in contempt when the motion for contempt citation did not contain detailed factual allegations, clearly and distinctly set forth the facts alleged to constitute contempt, or specify with reasonable certainty the time and place of the facts supporting the allegations of contempt.
Anderson v. Gaudin, No. 07S01-1505-PL-284, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Sept. 1, 2015).
“[U]nder the Home Rule Act, boards of county commissioners are authorized to amend a fire protection district, even if such amendment dissolves the district.”