• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

In re Custody of M.B., No. 65S04-1604-MI-00180, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 12, 2016).

April 18, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

“[A] third-party, who seeks to commence an independent child custody action under Indiana Code § 31-17-2-3(2), may properly do so in circuit court, but if a CHINS case is pending when the custody action is filed and no exception to the juvenile court’s exclusive jurisdiction is applicable, the circuit court should abstain from exercising its jurisdiction and stay any proceedings on the custody action until final disposition of the CHINS proceeding.”

City of Beech Grove v. Beloat, No. 49S02-1604-CT-165, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 5, 2016).

April 11, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

“City failed to meet its burden of demonstrating that the challenged act or omission was a policy decision made by consciously balancing risks and benefits. Thus, the City was not entitled to summary judgment on the question of discretionary function immunity under the [Indiana Tort Claims Act].”

Community Health Network v. Bails, No. 49A05-1512-PL-2059, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 7, 2016).

April 11, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Bailey

Absent fraud, an agreed judgment is not appealable.

Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Co., Inc., No. 54A01-1506-CT-602, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 31, 2016).

April 4, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker, M. May

Plaintiff’s status as an undocumented immigrant is relevant to a claim of lost earning capacity.

State v. Buncich, No. 45S00-1409-PL-587, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 22, 2016).

March 24, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, R. Rucker, Supreme

Consolidation of small voting precincts in Lake County is constitutional, nor is it an impermissible special law or a violation of the separation of powers doctrine.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 136
  • Go to page 137
  • Go to page 138
  • Go to page 139
  • Go to page 140
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs