• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Leonard v. State, No. 02S00-1604-LW-185, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 11, 2017).

August 14, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

In the Richmond Hill explosion murder case, the evidence was sufficient to support the murder convictions and the statutory aggravator; the trial court properly refused to include the lesser-included jury instruction; and, Indiana’s life without parole statute is constitutional.

In re the Name Change of A.L, No. 79A02-1703-MI-473, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2017).

August 14, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

No statutory requirement exists requiring publication of notice of intent to change gender marker. Although there is a statutory requirement to publish notice of intent to change one’s name, the record can be sealed and publication waived under Admin. Rule 9 if there is a showing of “a significant risk of substantial harm” for a transgender person to change name.

City of Fort Wayne v. Southwest Allen County Fire Protection District, No. 02A05-1612-PL-2883, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2017).

August 14, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over annexation issue. “Although annexation inevitably affects the allocation of tax revenue among units of government within the annexed area, it does not automatically follow that an action for a declaratory judgment with respect to an annexation statute arises under Indiana tax law and involves a dispute as to the interpretation of a tax law.”

Edwards v. Edwards, No. 64A03-1608-DR-1954, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 3, 2017).

August 7, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Sharpnack

Dissolution court had jurisdiction over the disbursement of pension and retirement benefits after the death of one of the parties to the dissolution.

Tucker v. Tom Raper, Inc., No. 89A01-1702-CC-463, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 3, 2017).

August 7, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb

The trial court erred in dismissing alleged third-party beneficiaries’ complaint for failing to comply with T.R. 9.2(A) and attaching a written contract to their complaint; third-party beneficiary status is not solely dependent upon a written contract.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 116
  • Go to page 117
  • Go to page 118
  • Go to page 119
  • Go to page 120
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 260
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs