• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Civil

Bd. of Cmm’r of Union Cty. v. McGuinness, No. 81S01-1708-PL-529, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 15, 2017).

August 21, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

County did not have third-party standing to sue on behalf of its residents.

Jones v. Wilson, No. 03A04-1701-PL-233, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2017).

August 21, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Kirsch

Using the broad type of plaintiff/broad type of harm analysis, third-party criminal act was not foreseeable. Defendant, wrestling event promoter, had no duty to plaintiff, attendee, who was attacked in the parking lot leaving the event.

Leonard v. State, No. 02S00-1604-LW-185, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 11, 2017).

August 14, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, Supreme

In the Richmond Hill explosion murder case, the evidence was sufficient to support the murder convictions and the statutory aggravator; the trial court properly refused to include the lesser-included jury instruction; and, Indiana’s life without parole statute is constitutional.

In re the Name Change of A.L, No. 79A02-1703-MI-473, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2017).

August 14, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, J. Baker

No statutory requirement exists requiring publication of notice of intent to change gender marker. Although there is a statutory requirement to publish notice of intent to change one’s name, the record can be sealed and publication waived under Admin. Rule 9 if there is a showing of “a significant risk of substantial harm” for a transgender person to change name.

City of Fort Wayne v. Southwest Allen County Fire Protection District, No. 02A05-1612-PL-2883, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 10, 2017).

August 14, 2017 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over annexation issue. “Although annexation inevitably affects the allocation of tax revenue among units of government within the annexed area, it does not automatically follow that an action for a declaratory judgment with respect to an annexation statute arises under Indiana tax law and involves a dispute as to the interpretation of a tax law.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 109
  • Go to page 110
  • Go to page 111
  • Go to page 112
  • Go to page 113
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 254
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs