Indiana “actual evidence” double jeopardy test applies only to convictions, not to acquittals, mistrials, or combinations of the two. Statute of limitations applied to bar amendment adding a new charge following mistrial.
T. Crone
Hortenberry v. Palmer, No. 10A04-1301-CT-17, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 15, 2013).
Trial Rule 3 is a “bright-line rule”; paying the filing fee is required for the commencement of an action.
Ryan v. State, No. 49A02-1211-CR-932, __ N.E.2 __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 31, 2013).
Prosecutor’s improper comments amounted to fundamental error.
Erkins v. State, No. 58A01-1205-CR-215, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. Ap., Apr. 23, 2013).
The State may obtain a conviction of Class A conspiracy to commit robbery with proof that the conspirators intended to cause serious bodily injury in committing the robbery.
Robinson v. State, No. 20A04-1209-CR-561, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 23, 2013).
Brief contact twice with the fog line on a curvy road at night did not confer reasonable suspicion for a traffic stop.