• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Eckelbarger v. State, No. 90S02-1603-CR-157, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., March 29, 2016).

April 4, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Consecutive 16-year sentences for both delivering and manufacturing methamphetamine were inappropriate where evidence of manufacturing was seized pursuant to search warrant for State-sponsored delivery offenses.

State v. Taylor, No. 46S04-1509-CR-552, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., March 30, 2016).

April 4, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: L. Rush, Supreme

Police eavesdropping on attorney-client conference was reprehensible and presumptively prejudicial, but under the circumstances did not necessarily warrant suppression of all testimony from officers who invoked their Fifth Amendment privilege about the eavesdropping. Presumption of prejudice was rebuttable if State could prove beyond reasonable doubt that each witness’s anticipated testimony was untainted by the misconduct and do so without implicating witnesses’ Fifth Amendment privilege.

State v. Buncich, No. 45S00-1409-PL-587, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 22, 2016).

March 24, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: M. Massa, R. Rucker, Supreme

Consolidation of small voting precincts in Lake County is constitutional, nor is it an impermissible special law or a violation of the separation of powers doctrine.

State v. International Business Machines Corp., No. 49S02-1408-PL-00513, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., March 22, 2016).

March 24, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Using the performance standards and indicators provided in the master services agreement, collective breaches were material in light of the agreement as a whole.

Wahl v. State, Nos. 29S04-1510-CR-605 and 29S04-1510-CR-606, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Mar. 15, 2016).

March 21, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, M. Massa, Supreme

Alternate juror interjecting himself into deliberations was presumptively prejudicial, and State failed to rebut the presumption; therefore, new trial was required.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 84
  • Go to page 85
  • Go to page 86
  • Go to page 87
  • Go to page 88
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 174
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2026 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs