• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Baker v. Tremco, Inc., No. 29S02-0902-CV-00065, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 3, 2009)

December 4, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

A constructive discharge claim may rest on involuntary resignation, but only where the cause fits within the grounds recognized by Indiana decisions on retaliatory discharge.

State ex rel. Kirtz v. Delaware Circuit Court No. 5, No. 18S00-0909-OR-411, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 13, 2009)

November 20, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

When defendant had testified against special prosecutor’s brother-in-law in an unrelated recent case, the special prosecutor’s appointment was dissolved by a Supreme Court writ of mandate and prohibition based on the appearance of impropriety.

Inlow v. Inlow, No. 29S02-0902-CV-89, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 18, 2009)

November 20, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

When settlement resolves a wrongful death action, a court should direct payment from the pre-trial wrongful death settlement that part of the medical, hospital, funeral, and burial expenses that corresponds to the ratio of the total of such expenses to the estimated total damages sustained.

Clark v. State, No. 43S00-0810-CR-575, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Oct. 15, 2009)

October 23, 2009 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

Defendant’s statements about himself on his “My Space” website as an “outlaw” were properly admitted to rebut his testimony at trial.

Williams v. Tharp, No. 29S02-0901-CV-40, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Oct. 13, 2009)

October 16, 2009 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, R. Rucker, Supreme, T. Boehm

In a defamation action, plaintiff can overcome defendant’s claim of qualified privilege by showing that defendant made the statement without belief or grounds for belief in its truth; the proper standard for determining grounds for belief in truth is not reckless disregard; the absence of any discernable basis for the truth of the matter can, however, serve as circumstantial evidence of a reporting citizen’s actual knowledge of falsity.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 159
  • Go to page 160
  • Go to page 161
  • Go to page 162
  • Go to page 163
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 171
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs