Suppression of evidence found during Indiana warrantless extradition arrest erroneously focused on flaws in Alabama magistrate’s probable cause determination, when correct inquiry was whether Indiana officers’ reliance on the report of Alabama warrant was reasonable.
Supreme
Beattie v. State, No. 82S01-0907-CR-307, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Apr. 8, 2010)
Inconsistent verdicts in criminal cases are permissible and are not subject to judicial review.
Kiplinger v. State, No. 62S00-0809-CR-486, __ N.E.2d __ (Mar. 22, 2010)
Life without parole sentence could not be imposed when jury made no express finding the alleged aggravating circumstance had been proven beyond a reasonable doubt and the jury returned no sentencing recommendation.
State v. Schlecty, No. 38S04-0905-CR-246, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar. 24, 2010)
Fourth Amendment permits a reasonably conducted warrantless search of a probationer’s property supported by a probation search term and a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.
Dowell v. State, No. 32S01–1003–PC–136, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar. 10, 2010)
Expressly adopts “prison mailbox rule” for filings under the appellate rules, but as filing of motion to correct error is subject to the Trial Rules the prisoner’s use of regular mail, rather than registered or certified mail, meant the motion was not filed until received by clerk and here was untimely.