• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Baker v. Taylor, No. 18S04-1002-CV-118, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Sept. 9, 2010)

September 17, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

Holder of a power of attorney who uses the power to create joint survivor accounts acts as a fiduciary whose right in the accounts is presumed invalid. Mere filing with the court of a deposition of a person incompetent under the Dead Man Statute does not waive the Statute’s prohibition of the deposition’s use as evidence.

Eads v. Community Hosps., No. 45S03-1001-CV-33, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Sept. 1, 2010)

September 3, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Supreme, T. Boehm

Where patient as injured leaving hospital, and the medical malpractice limitations period expired before the trial court dismissed her general negligence complaint for failure to comply with the Medical Malpractice Act, her medical malpractice action alleging the same facts as the dismissed complaint may be deemed a continuation of the first complaint for purposes of the Journey’s Account Statute.

Everling v. State, No. 48S05-0911-CR-506, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 8, 2010)

July 9, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

Judge’s overall conduct during trial demonstrated reversible bias.

Sample v. State, No. 45S03-1006-CR-338, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 30, 2010)

July 2, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Error in habitual offender instruction that jury “must” find habitual status if it finds priors proven was compounded, not avoided, by a “law and the facts” instruction which told jury the instructions were its “best source in determining what the law is.”

Duran v. State, No. 45S03-0910-CR-430, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 30, 2010)

July 2, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme, T. Boehm

An arrest warrant confers limited authority to enter a dwelling in which the suspect lives when there is reason to believe the suspect is within; when police knew only the building in which the suspect lived, an anonymous bystander’s direction to a specific apartment was not sufficiently reliable to confer the required “reason to believe” for a forced entry.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 150
  • Go to page 151
  • Go to page 152
  • Go to page 153
  • Go to page 154
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 169
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs