• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Green v. Ford Motor Co., No. 94S00-1007-CQ-348, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Feb. 8, 2011)

February 11, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

In a crashworthiness case alleging enhanced injuries under the Indiana Products Liability Act, the finder of fact shall apportion fault to the person suffering physical harm when that alleged fault is a responsible cause of the harm for which damages are being sought.

Galloway v. State, No. 33S01-1004-CR-163, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 22, 2010)

December 28, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, R. Shepard, Supreme

Reverses bench trial rejection of insanity defense because, despite “nonconflicting expert and lay opinion that defendant . . .was insane, the trial court rejected the insanity defense after concluding that the defendant could continue to be a danger to society because of an inadequate State mental health system.”

Nicoson v. State, No. 32S04–1003–CR–150, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 15, 2010)

December 17, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, R. Shepard, Supreme

Five year enhancement for use of a deadly weapon added to sentence for criminal confinement while armed with a deadly weapon was permitted by statute and by double jeopardy protection.

In re the Adoption of L.D., No. 49S02-1006-CV-330, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 16, 2010)

December 17, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Adoption notice by publication to mother complied with statute but failed to meet the due process requirement of a “diligent search reasonably calculated to determine the mother’s whereabouts.”

Runyon v. State, No. 57S04-1006-CR-317, __N.E.2d __ (Ind., Dec. 8, 2010)

December 10, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: B. Dickson, F. Sullivan, Supreme

To revoke probation for failure to comply with a financial condition, the State has the burden to prove by a preponderance that the condition was violated and that the violation was reckless, knowing, or intentional; the probationer has the burden to present “facts related to an inability to pay and indicating sufficient bona fide efforts to pay so as to persuade the trial court that further imprisonment should not be ordered.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 147
  • Go to page 148
  • Go to page 149
  • Go to page 150
  • Go to page 151
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs