• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

State v. Economic Freedom Fund, No. 07S00-1008-MI-411, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 29, 2011).

December 29, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, S. David, Supreme

The First Amendment claim against the Indiana Autodialer Law by an entity that uses an automated dialing device to deliver prerecorded political messages would likely fail; further, there is no reasonable likelihood of success on the merits of the entity’s claim that the Autodialer Law’s live-operator requirement materially burdens its right to engage in political speech in violation of the state constitution.

Snyder v. King, No. 94S00-1101-CQ-5, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 15, 2011).

December 21, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Misdemeanor battery is not an “infamous crime” for the purpose of Article II, § 8, of the Indiana Constitution, which authorizes the General Assembly to disenfranchise “any person convicted of an infamous crime”; additionally, the General Assembly has separate constitutional authority to cancel the registration of any person incarcerated following conviction, for the duration of incarceration.

Spangler v. Bechtel, No. 49S05-1012-CV-70, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Dec. 13, 2011).

December 15, 2011 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

“[P]arents’ separate actions seeking damages for emotional distress from experiencing the
stillbirth of their child are not barred by the Indiana Child Wrongful Death Act or the Indiana
Medical Malpractice Act.”

Hopper v. State, No. 13S01-1007-PC-399, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Nov. 29, 2011).

December 2, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, R. Shepard, Supreme

On rehearing, decides not to adopt original opinion’s supervisory waiver-of-counsel rule requiring advice of an attorney’s ability to negotiate with the State.

Jewell v. State, No. 32S04-1104-CR-200, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 30, 2011).

December 2, 2011 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Shepard, Supreme

When a defendant is represented by counsel for one offense, the Indiana Constitution permits police to question the defendant about other offenses without counsel present if the other offenses are not “inextricably intertwined” with the charged offense.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 137
  • Go to page 138
  • Go to page 139
  • Go to page 140
  • Go to page 141
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 170
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs