Any offense that causes the victim physical pain meets the test “bodily injury” requirement for domestic battery.
Supreme
Kane v. State, No. 30S04-1206-CR-372, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 30, 2012).
Jury instruction regarding accomplice liability, without mention of intent, was an incorrect statement of law, and the error was not harmless.
Robertson v. B.O., No. 49S04-1111-CT-671, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 31, 2012).
Indiana Code § 34-18-15-3(5) precludes the Patient Compensation Fund from disputing the existence or cause of the plaintiff’s claimed injury.
National Wine & Spirits, Inc. v. Ernst & Young, LLP, No. 49S02-1203-CT-137, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 23, 2012).
Collateral estoppel precludes the deception claim because the issue underlying that claim was decided during the arbitration proceedings.
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Barabas, No. 48S04-1204-CC-00213, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., Oct. 4, 2012).
MERS was an agent of the lender. Citimortgage, standing in MERS’s shoes, has standing to intervene in the mortgage foreclosure action.