• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Supreme

Clark v. Clark, No. 01S02-1112-CT-690, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., July 23, 2012).

July 26, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: B. Dickson, Supreme

The Indiana Guest Statute does not preclude a passenger from bringing a negligence action against a driver “as to injuries inflicted when such a passenger has exited the vehicle and is standing outside of it and directing the driver’s attempt to park.”

Hollin v. State, No. 69S05-1201-PC-6, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., July 12, 2012).

July 13, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: R. Rucker, Supreme

Affirms trial court holding that state’s failure to disclose favorable plea bargain given to accomplice who testified against defendant violated the Brady v. Maryland obligation to disclose favorable evidence.

Hirsch v. Oliver, No. 29S02-1109-DR-530, ___N.E.2d ___ (Ind., June 29, 2012).

July 5, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Under Ind. Code § 31-16-6-6(a)(3), if a trial court determines there is no longer an obligation of the parent to support the child, emancipation has necessarily occurred.

Gill v. Evansville Sheet Metal Works, Inc., No. 49S05-1111-CV-672, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., June 25, 2012).

June 28, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Defined “improvement to real property” as used in Indiana Code 32-30-1-5 as “(1) an addition to or betterment of real property; (2) that is permanent; (3) that enhances the real property’s capital value; (4) that involves the expenditure of labor or money; (5) that is designed to make the property more useful or valuable; and (6) that is not an ordinary repair.”

Whiting v. State, No. 38S05-1206-CR-345, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., June 19, 2012).

June 22, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: F. Sullivan, Supreme

Procedural default loss of a juror-bias claim when the defendant fails to exhaust her peremptory challenges is not amenable to fundamental-error review.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 131
  • Go to page 132
  • Go to page 133
  • Go to page 134
  • Go to page 135
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 171
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs