• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

S. David

State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. v. Jakubowicz, N0. 45$05-1605-CT-00253, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 26, 2016).

August 1, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

The insurance policy is ambiguous and must be construed in favor of the injured when the insurance policy provision requiring an insured to bring suit within three years is in direct conflict with the policy’s requirement that it will pay only if the underinsured motorist’s insurance has been exhausted.

Bradley v. State, No. 49S05-1602-CR-83, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., July 7, 2016).

July 11, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Houseguest did not have authority to consent to police entry without a warrant and all evidence seized was inadmissible.

Allen v. Allen, No. 13S01-1601-DR-00053, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., June 1, 2016).

June 6, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

Divorced parents are not obligated to pay the graduate or professional school expenses of their children pursuant to the Indiana child support statutes.

Citizens Action Coalition of Ind. v. Koch, No. 49S00-1510-PL-00607, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 19, 2016).

April 25, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: R. Rucker, S. David, Supreme

Whether the work product exception within the Indiana Access to Public Records Act applies to the Indiana General Assembly is a non-justiciable question.

In re Custody of M.B., No. 65S04-1604-MI-00180, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 12, 2016).

April 18, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: S. David, Supreme

“[A] third-party, who seeks to commence an independent child custody action under Indiana Code § 31-17-2-3(2), may properly do so in circuit court, but if a CHINS case is pending when the custody action is filed and no exception to the juvenile court’s exclusive jurisdiction is applicable, the circuit court should abstain from exercising its jurisdiction and stay any proceedings on the custody action until final disposition of the CHINS proceeding.”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Go to page 16
  • Go to page 17
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 33
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs