Affirms trial court holding that state’s failure to disclose favorable plea bargain given to accomplice who testified against defendant violated the Brady v. Maryland obligation to disclose favorable evidence.
R. Rucker
Kays v. State, No. 42S05-1107-CR-441, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar. 20, 2012).
While social security income may not itself be levied against to pay a criminal restitution order, social security may be taken into account in determining a defendant’s ability to pay restitution.
Witt v. Jay Petroleum, Inc., No. 38S02-1110-CV-608, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., March 21, 2012).
The trial court correctly held the parties and attorney in contempt, determined the sanction, and imposed it jointly and severally.
Marion Co. Auditor v. Sawmill Creek, LLC, No. 49S02-1106-CV-364, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind., March 21, 2012).
Auditor’s effort to notify property owner of the tax sale was constitutionally proficient in meeting the requirements of due process.
Hoglund v. State, No. 90S02-1105-CR-294, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind., Mar. 8, 2012).
Testimony that a “child is not prone to exaggerate or fantasize about sexual matters” will no longer be allowed.