The trial court abused its discretion when it permitted the State to amend the information two business days before the start of the trial as it did not give defendant a reasonable opportunity to prepare for and defend against the new counts.
R. Altice
Himsel, et al. v. Himsel, et al., No 18A-PL-645, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 22, 2019).
The Right to Farm Act, withstanding a constitutional challenge, bars plaintiffs’ nuisance, negligence, and trespass claims.
Perkins v. Memorial Hospital of South Bend, No. 18A-CT-1340, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 11, 2019).
Employee’s mistaken belief that he was subpoenaed to testify at an unemployment hearing did not warrant an exception to the at-will employment doctrine.
State v. Stafford, No. 39A04-1705-CR-930, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 27, 2018).
A trial court may not amend a sentence made pursuant to a fixed plea agreement; however, a trial court is authorized to reject such an agreement.
In re Civil Commitment of T.W., No. 18A-MH-1148, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 21, 2018).
Although commissioner could not enter a final appealable order for temporary commitment, appellate review of the issue was waived because commitment order was not objected to prior to appeal.