The sentence imposed by the trial court, including the habitual substance offender enhancement, is not inappropriate under Appellate Rule 7(B) and does not warrant appellate revision.
Per Curiam
McCain v. State, No. 18S-CR-26, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 17, 2018).
Trial court’s forty-year sentence for felony child molesting was not inappropriate and does not warrant appellate revision under Appellate Rule 7(B).
Town of Ellettsville v. DeSpirito, No. 53S01-1709-PL-612, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 12, 2017).
In re D.J. v. Ind. Dep’t of Child Servs. did not relax the procedural requirements for appellate jurisdiction. The prerequisites for appellate jurisdiction are entry of an appealable order by the trial court and the trial court clerk’s entry of the notice of completion of the clerk’s record on the chronological case summary.
Jean-Baptiste v. State, No. 49S02-1707-CR-00500, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Oct. 3, 2017).
The Court of Appeals’ sua sponte constitutional analysis, that personal waiver of right to a jury trial must be on the record for a misdemeanor, is vacated.
Pilkington v. Pilkington, No. 18S02-1708-PL-554, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Aug. 30, 2017).
Trial court has subject matter jurisdiction to determine what interest in a trust was sold in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings.