Proof of the “slightest penetration” of the female sex organ, including penetration of the external genitalia, is sufficient to sustain a conviction for child molestation based on sexual intercourse.
Per Curiam
T.H. v. State, No. 18S-JV-80,__ N.E.3d __(Ind., March 9, 2018)
Affirms the Court of Appeals opinion that no reasonable fact-finder could find the element of loss of at least $750 was proven beyond a reasonable doubt when there are unexplained anomalies in the repair estimate.
Robinson v. State, No. 18S-CR-33, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Feb. 23, 2018).
The sentence imposed by the trial court, including the habitual substance offender enhancement, is not inappropriate under Appellate Rule 7(B) and does not warrant appellate revision.
McCain v. State, No. 18S-CR-26, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Jan. 17, 2018).
Trial court’s forty-year sentence for felony child molesting was not inappropriate and does not warrant appellate revision under Appellate Rule 7(B).
Town of Ellettsville v. DeSpirito, No. 53S01-1709-PL-612, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., Dec. 12, 2017).
In re D.J. v. Ind. Dep’t of Child Servs. did not relax the procedural requirements for appellate jurisdiction. The prerequisites for appellate jurisdiction are entry of an appealable order by the trial court and the trial court clerk’s entry of the notice of completion of the clerk’s record on the chronological case summary.