• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Per Curiam

Caetano v. Massachusetts, No. 14-10078, ___ U.S. ___ (March 21, 2016).

March 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Second Amendment protects possession of stun guns; right is not limited to arms in existence at the founding or weapons useful in warfare.

Slaybaugh v. State, No. 79S02-1601-CR-28, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Jan. 20, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Fact that juror was Facebook “friends” with relatives of the victim did not establish juror misconduct, when juror testified that she did not know them personally or recognize them in court, and trial court found her testimony truthful.

Gibson v. State, No. 39S05-1509-CR-517, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 31, 2015).

September 4, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Pulling the victim to the ground during the course of a battery was insufficient to establish D-felony criminal confinement by removal under I.C. § 35-42-3-3(a)(2).

YTC Dream Homes, Inc. v DirectBuy, Inc., No. 45S03-1505-PL-264, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., May 12, 2015).

May 14, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

The determination of whether an out-of-state attorney is granted temporary admission should be made without restriction by local rule and within the discretion granted by Indiana Admission and Discipline Rule 3(2) – whether good cause exists for the admission of the attorneys.

Cohen & Malad, LLP v. Daly, No. 29S02-1504-PL-165, __N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 8, 2015).

April 9, 2015 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

“Absent agreement otherwise, ‘a lawyer retained under a contingent fee contract but discharged prior to the contingency is entitled to recover the value of services rendered if there is a subsequent settlement or award[,]’ and in that case, ‘the fee is to be measured by the proportion of the total fee equal to the contribution of the discharged lawyer’s efforts to the ultimate result[.]’”

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 17
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs