• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

Per Curiam

Sanford v. State, No. 49S05-1604-PC-210, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind., April 27, 2016).

May 2, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Under the unique circumstances of this case, defendant has permission to file a belated Notice of Appeal under Post-Conviction Rule 2 because the defendant’s failure to file a timely Notice of Appeal was not his fault, and the defendant has been diligent in requesting permission to file a belated Notice of Appeal under the Rule.

Ammons v. State, No. 45S03-1604-CR-167, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Apr. 5, 2016).

April 11, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Requiring an Indiana resident, who recently moved to Indiana from another state, to register as a sex offender is not an ex post facto violation when offender was already required to register in another jurisdiction.

Eckelbarger v. State, No. 90S02-1603-CR-157, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., March 29, 2016).

April 4, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Consecutive 16-year sentences for both delivering and manufacturing methamphetamine were inappropriate where evidence of manufacturing was seized pursuant to search warrant for State-sponsored delivery offenses.

Caetano v. Massachusetts, No. 14-10078, ___ U.S. ___ (March 21, 2016).

March 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, S. Alito, SCOTUS

Second Amendment protects possession of stun guns; right is not limited to arms in existence at the founding or weapons useful in warfare.

Slaybaugh v. State, No. 79S02-1601-CR-28, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind., Jan. 20, 2016).

January 25, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Per Curiam, Supreme

Fact that juror was Facebook “friends” with relatives of the victim did not establish juror misconduct, when juror testified that she did not know them personally or recognize them in court, and trial court found her testimony truthful.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 11
  • Go to page 12
  • Go to page 13
  • Go to page 14
  • Go to page 15
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 18
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs