• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

P. Riley

Dilley v. State, No. 19A-CR-173, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 23, 2019).

October 28, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

A trial court errs when it grants the State’s motion for continuance, based the unavailability of laboratory testing results, under Criminal Rule 4(D), where the State fails to establish diligence.

Ind. Bureau of Motor Vehicles v. Douglass, No. 19A-MI-216, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 23, 2019).

October 28, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

BMV had the right to pursue a suspension of defendant’s driving privileges in Indiana even though he was a no longer a resident of Indiana.

State v. Fahringer, No. 18A-CR-2985, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 12, 2019).

September 16, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

The trial court’s certification of its suppression order for interlocutory appeal was an abuse of its discretion because the State’s request for certification was untimely under App. R. 14(B)(1)(a).

Davis v. State, No. 19A-CR-631, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 31, 2019).

August 5, 2019 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying defendant’s request for an attorney made during the bench trial more than one year after affirming his request for self-representation.

Edwards v. Edwards, No. 19A-DR-509, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 30, 2019).

August 5, 2019 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Although the US Supreme Court opinion Howell v. Howell holds that state courts are not permitted to order a veteran to indemnify a divorced spouse for the loss of the spouse’s portion of the veteran’s retirement pay caused by the veteran’s waiver of retirement pay to receive service-related disability benefit, the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction to enter an order on veteran’s retirement pay prior to that opinion.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Go to page 7
  • Go to page 8
  • Go to page 9
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 30
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs