• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

P. Riley

State v. Johnson, No. 21A-CR-1726, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 23, 2022).

March 7, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

A prior conviction or acquittal in another jurisdiction bars a subsequent Indiana state prosecution for the “same conduct.” Indiana statutory double jeopardy analysis centers on comparing the conduct alleged in the charging instruments.

Guthery v. State, No. 21A-CR-711, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 22, 2021).

January 3, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

The felony suspendability statute is not a progressive penalty statute, as it does not elevate the seriousness of an offense and its corresponding penalty due to a previous conviction. Rather, it merely limits the discretion of the trial court to order a sentence to be suspended, all within the existing sentencing range for the offense. To that end, the felony suspendability statute is not a sentencing enhancement statute to which double-enhancement analysis applies.

Wheeler v. State, No. 21A-MI-1175, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 17, 2021).

November 22, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Inmate was not required to plead exhaustion of remedies to state a claim for negligence; his negligence claim was not subject to dismissal under the Screening Statute on that basis.

Duncan v. Barton’s Discounts, LLC, No. 21A-PL-211, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Nov. 3, 2021).

November 8, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Possibly incriminating text messages are not protected by the Fifth Amendment in a civil discovery proceeding because the text messages were voluntarily created prior to the issuance of the discovery requests, and they are non-testimonial in nature.

A.S. v. Ind. Dept. of Child Services., No. 20A-JT-1525,__ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 30, 2021).

August 2, 2021 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

A successor judge who did not hear the evidence can still certify the recreated record created pursuant to Ind. App. Rule 31.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Go to page 5
  • Go to page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 30
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs