• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

P. Riley

Killibrew v. State, No. 34A02-1204-CR-303, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 19, 2012)

October 25, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

“[C]ontinuous use of a turn signal without turning or switching lanes” is not a traffic infraction and did not suggest impairment which would justify an investigatory stop.

In re the Matter of G.W., No. 07A01-1201-JM-6, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 10, 2012).

October 12, 2012 Filed Under: Civil, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley, T. Crone

A trial court may order a parent to make a child available for an interview requested by DCS to assess that child’s “condition” pursuant to Ind. Code § 31-33-8-7, where the child’s older sibling has made and then recanted allegations of sexual abuse against a family member who lives in the children’s home.

Adams v. State, No. 49A05-1107-CR-372,___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., May 24, 2012).

May 25, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

The definition of mature stalks of marijuana is not unconstitutionally vague in light of the facts and circumstances of the present case.

Crider v. State, No. 91A05-1108-CR-389, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 29, 2012).

March 30, 2012 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, E. Friedlander, P. Riley

Plea agreement waiving “right to challenge sentence on the basis it is erroneous” is enforced on appeal.

Myers v. Coats, No. 49A04-1104-PL-20, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 29, 2012).

March 30, 2012 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Plaintiff had a liberty interest in not being mistakenly labeled as a sex offender and the process to challenge such erroneous listing was inadequate, however, there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether a DOC employee personally deprived plaintiff of a constitutional right.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 19
  • Go to page 20
  • Go to page 21
  • Go to page 22
  • Go to page 23
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 30
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs