• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

P. Riley

Ivankovic v. Ivankovic, No. 22A-DC-2933, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., March 15, 2023).

March 20, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

There is no visitation for pets; trial court should not have included in dissolution decree a provision which allows the family dog to travel back and forth between the parties’ households during parenting time.

Expert Pool Builders, LLC v. Vangundy, No. 22A-PL-1499, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 18, 2023).

January 23, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik, P. Riley

Defendant waived his appeal of the default judgment by failing to file a T.R. 60(B) motion to set aside the default judgment; a motion to correct error did not preserve the issue.

Brugh v. Milestone Contractors, LP, No. 22A-CT-845, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 11, 2023).

January 17, 2023 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Surviving spouse timely substituted herself as the real party in interest within the prescribed time limitations of the Indiana Wrongful Death Stature; the deadline was tolled by the Supreme Court’s orders regarding COVID-19.

Perry v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 22A-CT-605, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2022).

October 17, 2022 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, P. Riley

Federal civil rights violation and state law defamation claims against DCS case manager were properly dismissed for failure to state claims upon which relief could be granted; the case manager had qualified immunity.

A.R. v. State, No. 22A-JV-156, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2022).

October 11, 2022 Filed Under: Criminal, Juvenile Tagged With: Appeals, E. Tavitas, P. Riley

While Ind. Code § 31-30-2-3, states that the trial court, on its own motion, may reinstate a jurisdiction over a juvenile after release from DOC, a motion by the prosecution is sufficient. Moreover, Ind. Code § 11-8-8-4.5, which subjects an offender who is at least 14 years age to sex offender registration, applies at the time of registration, not when the delinquent act was committed.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3
  • Go to page 4
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 30
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs