There is no visitation for pets; trial court should not have included in dissolution decree a provision which allows the family dog to travel back and forth between the parties’ households during parenting time.
P. Riley
Expert Pool Builders, LLC v. Vangundy, No. 22A-PL-1499, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 18, 2023).
Defendant waived his appeal of the default judgment by failing to file a T.R. 60(B) motion to set aside the default judgment; a motion to correct error did not preserve the issue.
Brugh v. Milestone Contractors, LP, No. 22A-CT-845, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 11, 2023).
Surviving spouse timely substituted herself as the real party in interest within the prescribed time limitations of the Indiana Wrongful Death Stature; the deadline was tolled by the Supreme Court’s orders regarding COVID-19.
Perry v. Ind. Dept. of Child Svcs., No. 22A-CT-605, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 12, 2022).
Federal civil rights violation and state law defamation claims against DCS case manager were properly dismissed for failure to state claims upon which relief could be granted; the case manager had qualified immunity.
A.R. v. State, No. 22A-JV-156, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 5, 2022).
While Ind. Code § 31-30-2-3, states that the trial court, on its own motion, may reinstate a jurisdiction over a juvenile after release from DOC, a motion by the prosecution is sufficient. Moreover, Ind. Code § 11-8-8-4.5, which subjects an offender who is at least 14 years age to sex offender registration, applies at the time of registration, not when the delinquent act was committed.