Defendant failed to show that selection of his jury from Judicial Center list violated Sixth Amendment’s “fair cross section” requirement.
N. Vaidik
Nasser v. St. Vincents Hospital and Health Services, No. 49A02-0910-CV-955, __ N.E.2d__ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 14, 20010)
Medical causation opinion of nurse serving on medical review panel was not admissible as expert opinion under Evidence Rule 702 and thus could not be used in resolving summary judgment motion.
Julie C. v. Andrew C., No. 49A05-0909-CV-523, __N.E.2D__ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 30, 2010)
Change in visitation to seven nights every two weeks was a de facto change of custody subject to the statutes on custody modification. When considering changing a decree for joint legal custody, the court must consider the joint legal custody factors in IC 31-17-2-15 in addition to the standard factors in IC 31-17-2-8.
Runyon v. State, No. 57A04-0910-CR-575, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Mar. 11, 2010)
When a person convicted of nonsupport of a dependent must pay support as a condition of probation, he has the burden to prove he was unable to pay at a revocation for having failed to make the support payments.
Allied Property & Cas. Ins. Co. v. Good, No. 85A04-0902-CV-89, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 31, 2009)
If a trial court finds that an attorney or party caused a mistrial by egregiously violating an order in limine, the trial court has the inherent power to sanction him or her.