• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

N. Vaidik

Moore v. State, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 21, 2010)

October 22, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb, N. Vaidik

A woman who was asleep in the passenger seat of her car, which her friend was driving, did not thereby commit the public intoxication offense.

J.B. v. E.B., 34A04-1002-DR-110, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 20, 2010)

October 22, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

J.B. v. E.B. (Ind. Ct. App., Vaidik, J.)-Child custody modification proceeding based on report the son had touched his sister inappropriately was not subject to the counselor/client privilege, so that records of son’s counseling were admissible.

State v. Lucas, No. 91A05-1003-CR-247, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 30, 2010)

October 7, 2010 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Portable breath test mouthpiece is not a foreign substance which would invalid a subsequent Datamaster blood alcohol content test.

Kalwitz v. Kalwitz, No. 46A03-0912-CV-574, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 20, 2010)

September 28, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

As all small claims defenses are deemed at issue without a responsive pleading, a litigant wanting an “automatic” small claims change of judge must request it within 30 days of the date the case is placed on the CCS as having been filed.

Regalado v. Eastate of Regalado, No. 64A05-0911-CV-672, ___ N.E.2d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 27, 2010)

September 3, 2010 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Indiana Code section 29-1-2-7(b), which governs paternal inheritance to, through, and from a child born out of wedlock, requires a child to show she is a child born out of wedlock; because there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the child in this case was a child born out of wedlock, trial court erred in granting summary judgment in the child’s favor.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 37
  • Go to page 38
  • Go to page 39
  • Go to page 40
  • Go to page 41
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 46
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs