Misdemeanor expungement statutes as in effect prior to Mar. 26, 2014 did not allow trial court to deny expungement based on victim’s statement.
N. Vaidik
In re Order for Payment of Attorney Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses, No. 48A02-1307-MI-615, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 9, 2014).
State’s obligation to pay costs of representing inmates in prosecutions for offenses committed in correctional facilities includes not just trial expenses but also expenses for appellate representation.
Thompson v. State, No. 61A01-1305-CR-207, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 13, 2014).
Operating a vehicle with a blood-alcohol concentration of .08 causing serious bodily injury is a “crime of violence” not subject to the statutory cap on consecutive sentencing.
TP Orthodontics, Inc. v. Kesling, No. 46A03-1207-MI-324, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Sept. 3, 2013).
When a corporation forms a special litigation committee, and the corporation later requests dismissal of derivative claims based on the findings of that committee, attorney-client privilege in the special litigation committee’s report is waived.
Dillon v. State, No. 27A05-1210-CR-542, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 14, 2013).
When nunc pro tunc order reinstating OWI conviction after its “inadvertent[] dismissal” by State was entered after defendant had committed his second OWI offense, the reinstated conviction could not serve as a basis for enhancing the second to a D felony.