Despite the T.R. 76(B) request for change of judge, matters in the case remanded by the Court of Appeals should be heard by the prior judge who heard the evidence.
N. Vaidik
Hurd v. State, No. 49A02-1309-CR-753, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 21, 2014).
Probation condition to stay out of an extensive portion of central Indianapolis was not reasonably related to the probationer’s treatment and public safety.
Taylor v. State, No. 45A03-1310-CR-406, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 24, 2014).
Misdemeanor expungement statutes as in effect prior to Mar. 26, 2014 did not allow trial court to deny expungement based on victim’s statement.
In re Order for Payment of Attorney Fees and Reimbursement of Expenses, No. 48A02-1307-MI-615, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Apr. 9, 2014).
State’s obligation to pay costs of representing inmates in prosecutions for offenses committed in correctional facilities includes not just trial expenses but also expenses for appellate representation.
Thompson v. State, No. 61A01-1305-CR-207, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 13, 2014).
Operating a vehicle with a blood-alcohol concentration of .08 causing serious bodily injury is a “crime of violence” not subject to the statutory cap on consecutive sentencing.