Trial court erred in excluding phone call transcript containing information about alleged molesting victim’s apparent false accusation of nonconsensual sex with another individual; also holds trial court erred in not compelling a party to the phone call to answer deposition questions about the call.
N. Vaidik
In re S.E., No. 29A02-1312-JT-1064, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 30, 2014).
Trial court did not violate defendant’s due-process rights by requiring her to testify by signing to an interpreter.
Belcher v. Kroczek, No. 45A03-1311-CT-436 , __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 9, 2014).
Reputation, privacy, and identity are not chattel under T.R. 75(A)(2).
Hoagland v. Franklin Township Comm. School Corp., No. 49A02-1301-PL-44, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 10, 2014).
Students cannot be charged to ride the bus to and from school.
In re V.A., No. 39A01-1307-JP-304, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 30, 2014).
Despite the T.R. 76(B) request for change of judge, matters in the case remanded by the Court of Appeals should be heard by the prior judge who heard the evidence.