• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • Categories
    • Civil
    • Criminal
    • Juvenile
  • Courts
    • Supreme
    • Appeals
    • Tax
    • SCOTUS
    • 7th Circuit
  • Judges

Case Clips

Published by the Indiana Office of Court Services

N. Vaidik

Mannix v. State, No. 49A04-1505-CR-294, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 23, 2016).

March 29, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik, T. Crone

Chemical test administered over three hours after accident is admissible, but deprives the State of the rebuttable presumption that the results reflect driver’s time-of-accident BAC.
Trial court could not rely solely on elements of one offense to impose greater-than-advisory sentence for the other.

Lowden v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-170, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App., March 10, 2016).

March 14, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

For purposes of aggravated battery, “substantial risk of death or … protracted loss or impairment of the function of a bodily member or organ” is not a material element of the offense, but rather a result to which mens rea is inapplicable.

State v. Hargrave, No. 82A01-1504-CR-137, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Feb. 2, 2016).

February 8, 2016 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, M. Robb, N. Vaidik

A person who holds a CDL license at the time of committing a traffic violation may not participate in a diversion program or have judgment deferred on that conviction.

Kevin T. Scripture, M.D. et al. v. Julia and Steven Roberts, No. 49A02-1504-CT-211, ___ N.E.3d ___, (Ind. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2016).

February 2, 2016 Filed Under: Civil Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Doctors’ conclusory affidavits failed to raise genuine issue of fact; affidavits merely restated the denials in their pleadings and did not cite facts to support that they met the standard of care or did not cause plaintiffs’ damages.

Powell v. State, No. 49A02-1503-CR-135, ___ N.E.3d ___ (Ind. Ct. App. Oct. 27, 2015).

November 2, 2015 Filed Under: Criminal Tagged With: Appeals, N. Vaidik

Trespass conviction was reversed for insufficient evidence that the defendant was still on a bar’s property at the time he was told to leave.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 23
  • Go to page 24
  • Go to page 25
  • Go to page 26
  • Go to page 27
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Go to page 46
  • Go to Next Page »

Footer

About

Case Clips is a weekly publication of the Indiana Office of Court Services featuring appellate opinions curated by IOCS staff for Indiana judges.

Subscribe
  • Flickr
  • RSS
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Archive

Copyright © 2025 · Indiana Office of Court Services · courts.in.gov/iocs