The defendant was not entitled to discharge under Criminal Rule 4(C) as trial-court proceedings were “stayed” when the trial court authorized an interlocutory appeal by the State and vacated the upcoming trial date, but did not actually use the word “stay.”
N. Vaidik
Walmsley v. State, No. 18A-CR-2506, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 29, 2019).
A felony-murder charge of delivery of a narcotic drug resulting in death does not apply when two or more people jointly acquired and possessed the drug.
Wilcoxson v. State, No. 18A-CR-1882, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 29, 2019).
Defendant may be charged with two counts of attempted murder when he fired shots in the direction of two different officers, and double jeopardy doesn’t apply under either the continuous-crime doctrine or the very same act test.
Blankenship v. Duke, No. 19A-GU-518, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Aug. 9, 2019).
When a trial court orders parenting time in a guardianship case, it cannot allow the guardian to determine the parent’s parenting time with their child.
In re Adoption of C.A.H., No. 19A-AD-240, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., July 30, 2019).
Father’s consent to adoption was irrevocably implied pursuant to Ind. Code § 31-19-10-1.2(g) because father failed to appear for the final hearing.