While it is well settled that if the elected prosecutor has a conflict of interest, the whole office is disqualified; it is not necessary to disqualify the whole office if one deputy has a conflict of interest.
N. Vaidik
Willet v. State, No. 19A-CR-2699, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jul. 31, 2020).
Petition which challenges release date of parole based on a claim that Petitioner’s sentence has expired, is properly filed as a habeas corpus petition
Killian v. State, No. 19A-CR-2628, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jun. 3, 2020).
Indiana Rule of Evidence 412(b)(1)(A) only allows evidence of other sexual behavior that—itself—could have produced some physical evidence that is presented in the case.
In re Termination of Tre.S, No. 19A-JT-2915, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 27, 2020).
Reminder to trial-level DCS attorneys and trial courts that they have a duty to ensure that parents’ due-process rights in termination cases are not violated.
Harris v. State, No. 19A-CR-1863, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., May 13, 2020).
Pursuant to Indiana Rule of Evidence 615(c), the parent of a juvenile waived to adult court is a person whose presence a party shows to be essential to presenting the party’s claim or defense.