Indiana Code 35-33-8-5 allows the court to increase bail, but only after the State requests the increase and presents evidence in support.
M. Robb
McBride v. State, No. 18A-CR-580, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 28, 2019).
The trial court should have imposed as a condition of probation that the defendant convicted felon was unequivocally prohibited from possessing a firearm pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Neither the trial court nor the probation department has authority to grant such permission during the term of probation.
Tutino v. Rohr-Indy Motors Inc., No. 18A-CT-2435, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 18, 2019).
Because the issues of fact were not material to the resolution of the case summary judgment was appropriate.
N.E. v. L.W., No. 18A-PO-2514, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., June 14, 2019).
The trial court erred in denying petition for a protection order on grounds that a no-contact order was in place.
Redington v. State, No. 18A-CR-950, __ N.E.3d __ (Ind. Ct. App., April 5, 2019).
When a person petitions for the return of guns confiscated under the Jake Laird “red flag” Law for being a dangerous person, the State must present evidence that the person is dangerous now and, in the future, not that he was dangerous in the past.