A series of adverse rulings against one party is not a pattern indicating bias without a demonstration of actual personal bias of the trial judge.
M. Robb
Christie v. State, No. 33A01-1006-CR-306, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Jan. 10, 2011)
At State’s request in a community corrections revocation based on defendant’s commission of a new crime, trial judge properly took judicial notice under Ev. Rule 201(b) of records of town court showing defendant’s new conviction in that court.
Segar v. State, No. 49A02-1003-CR-269, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Dec. 1, 2010)
Defendant did not waive his objection to the admission of the marijuana found on his person when he earlier made no objection to officers’ “foundational” testimony that material in his pocket “resembled” and “was believed to be” marijuana.
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Clancy, No. 45A03-0910-CV-498, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 26, 2010)
Insurance company’s affirmative defense that coverage for husband’s emotional distress claim was “fairly debatable” was not an advice of counsel defense and hence did not waive attorney-client privilege for communications with Allstate’s counsel.
Moore v. State, __ N.E.2d __ (Ind. Ct. App., Oct. 21, 2010)
A woman who was asleep in the passenger seat of her car, which her friend was driving, did not thereby commit the public intoxication offense.